We provided a mathematical analysis of how a rational agent would respond to data generated by a sycophantic AI that samples examples from the distribution implied by the user’s hypothesis (p(d|h∗)p(d|h^{*})) rather than the true distribution of the world (p(d|true process)p(d|\text{true process})). This analysis showed that such an agent would be likely to become increasingly confident in an incorrect hypothesis. We tested this prediction through people’s interactions with LLM chatbots and found that default, unmodified chatbots (our Default GPT condition) behave indistinguishably from chatbots explicitly prompted to provide confirmatory evidence (our Rule Confirming condition). Both suppressed rule discovery and inflated confidence. These results support our model, and the fact that default models matched an explicitly confirmatory strategy suggests that this probabilistic framework offers a useful model for understanding their behavior.
They are defined in both databases as:
。谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】对此有专业解读
RE# gives you 1 match - the entire string:，推荐阅读51吃瓜获取更多信息
02:00, 4 марта 2026Из жизни
From a Bluesky post to my favorite open source community