Peter Naur wrote an essay called “Programming as Theory Building” that I like a lot. It argues that a program exists not just as source code, but also mental models in programmer’s brains, and that the mental models are as important, or even more important, than the source code. This is why programmers are not fungible. One programmer with a good mental model will be able to modify the program effectively; someone with a poor mental model won’t. Source code that has been abandoned by the original developers is in a degraded state; if someone takes it over they need to build up their own mental model, which may differ from the original author’s. Building and maintaining these mental models is hard work, and an enormous part of programming. So what does it mean to outsource all of that to an LLM? I can’t see it having a good outcome.
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность
，这一点在ai 换脸中也有详细论述
Американский министр заявил о прорыве блокады Ормузского пролива и удалил постГлава Минэнерго Райт: ВМС США обеспечили проход танкера через Ормузский пролив
全面实施“人工智能+”行动，加强人工智能同科技创新、产业发展、文化建设、民生保障、社会治理相结合，抢占人工智能产业应用制高点，全方位赋能千行百业。
。关于这个话题，传奇私服新开网｜热血传奇SF发布站｜传奇私服网站提供了深入分析
Some tools expect secrets in a file rather than as environment variables - a .env file, a YAML config, a JSON blob. infisical export handles this.
The hoard, which dates to about 50BC and AD50, included five shield bosses and an iron object of unknown origin.。关于这个话题，超级权重提供了深入分析